Coronavirus: Is It Safer to Live in a Dirty and Messy Environment?
According to Indian media reports, a new study in India found that countries with poor sanitation and environmental conditions and poor water quality have lower death rates from new coronary pneumonia compared with rich countries with high sanitation.
Indian media reported that, so far, scientists have been puzzled that the infection rate and death rate of new coronary pneumonia in poorer countries are lower than those in richer countries.
According to research, research from the Indian Council of Science and Industrial Research (CSIR), the National Cell Science Center (NCCS), and the Chennai Institute of Mathematics, India seem to support the theory that improved immunity can make people not so easy Suffer from a serious viral disease, and the environmental conditions in poor countries can increase people’s resistance.
- Prevent Coronavirus Spreading With Right Mask: 3 Points to Know
- Steps to help prevent the spread of COVID-19 if you are sick
- Test Kit for Coronavirus: SARS-CoV-2 Nucleic Acid Detection Kit (Rapid PCR Fluorescence Method)
- Symptoms (COVID-19)
- How does ZeroVirus protect us from virus?
CSIR Director-General Dr. Shehar Mand said that population structure, health conditions and autoimmunity are positively related to the death rate of new Coronavirus pneumonia. Mander told the Indian Express: “Researchers from the National Cell Science Center (NCCS) in Pune, India and the Chennai Institute of Mathematics, India conducted a statistical analysis and examined 25 to 30 parameters, including water. , Health facilities, and data on patients who died of new coronary pneumonia per million people in 106 countries/regions. Researchers found that the worse the quality of water sanitation, the fewer the number of deaths due to viral diseases per million people. Because these conditions affect a person’s overall immunity.”
Although the results of the study show that the worse the water environment in a country, the lower the death rate of new coronary pneumonia, but this study strongly recommends that weak sanitation conditions should not be used as a mechanism to deal with the disease.
As a co-author of the study, Mander said: “In India, the severity of infection seems to be lower because our immunity levels are better than Europeans and Americans against any infection.”
According to research data, Bihar is facing problems such as the lack of clean drinking water facilities. Its new crown pneumonia case fatality rate is 0.5%, while that of India is 1.5%. The death rates in Kerala and Assam are 0.4%, Telangana is 0.5%, and Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh are 0.9%. The Indian government has set a mortality rate of less than 1% as a national goal.
According to the recommendations of health experts, improving hygiene habits, such as improving environmental sanitation, providing safe drinking water, and hand washing facilities, can reduce the impact of infectious diseases. However, Indian researchers said that the reduction in exposure to the source of infection may be related to the high incidence of autoimmune diseases.
As far as the water quality of India is concerned, the Ganges, regarded as the “Holy River” by Hindus, has gradually become one of the most polluted rivers in the world. While other mother rivers are characterized by wideness, clarity, commercial throughput, and abundant water resources, she is unique. “Holy” and “dirty” fly together. “Floating corpses” share the same color as “feces and urine”, and are rated as the world’s best The disgusting holy river. Although it is the most polluted river in the world, Indians still brush their teeth, wash rice, wash bed sheets in the Ganges, and some even directly drink the water inside. Both men, women and children in India believe that being able to bathe in the dirty Ganges water is the greatest glory of life.
Some additional comments:
It is difficult to understand and agree with the conclusions of this study. Of course, judging from the sample data of the study, it seems logical. However, if one considers the error in the accuracy of statistics in poor areas, then this conclusion is worth doubting. After all, many of the people who died from the new coronavirus in European and American countries are poor, and their living environment should not be very good.
In addition, as a typical counter-example, in Japan, a country known for its clean and tidy cities, the number of infections and deaths is not that serious. Therefore, the number of infections and the death rate depend more on the country, society, and individuals’ awareness of the virus, the responsibility to society and the family, and the respect and compliance to the government and scientists’ safety protection regulations.
Of course, hope that this research will not be a good excuse for the Indian government to be unsuccessful in the epidemic.